• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Christina Meetoo

On Media, Society and Mauritius

  • About me
  • My research and publications

freedom of information

Transcription of live tweet session on the State of Right to Information in Mauritius

18/10/2017 By christina Leave a Comment

The State of the Right to Information in Mauritius in 2017
Transcription of live tweet session
organised by the African Freedom of Information Centre (AFIC)
with Christina Meetoo (@christinameetoo) and Abdoollah Earally (@AbdEarally)

Hashtag #AccessToInfo
This live tweet session was held on Tuesday 17 October 2017 from 15.00 to 16.30 (Mauritian time)

Tweets have been slightly edited for punctuation and typos.

For more information, read the full report and the Mauritius country report at: https://www.christinameetoo.com/2017/10/17/report-on-the-state-of-access-to-information-in-africa-2017/

Mauritius country report of State of Right to Information 2017

AFIC‏ @AFIC1
Question 1. @christinameetoo Which are the guarantees for ATI in Mauritius, at national and international level?

Christina Meetoo @christinameetoo:

  • There is no law on access to information in #Mauritius, thus no specific guarantee for access to information in Mauritius.
  • There is only a clause on freedom of expression in Constitution to guarantee freedom to receive & impart ideas and information.
  • This freedom is curtailed by restrictions linked to national security, privacy, public morality, public safety, health, etc.
  • And there’s an Official Secrets Act & a Human Resource Manual which prohibit civil servants from sharing information without authorisation.
  • In 2005 and 2015, winning coalitions have promised to introduce legislation on freedom of information (but not in 2010).
  • In 2013, government appointed consultant Geoffrey Robertson proposed FOI legislation, reform of media laws & media self-regulation.
  • In January 2016, Cabinet announced that a bill on FOI was being prepared.
  • In March 2016, the ACHPR country report committed to introduce FOI legislation, suggesting that the State Law Office is working on a draft.
  • But, there is little visibility so far on progress made.

Sarah‏ @sarahfkiw:
How far has this bill been? Why has it not yet been signed? #SDG16 #accesstoinformation #Mauritius #IDUAI @Gilbertsendugwa

Christina Meetoo @christinameetoo:

  • No bill has been presented yet. We are assuming that the State Law Office is working on a draft bill but we have no further information.
  • FOI legislation is very difficult step for political parties as it could result in constant scrutiny & questioning by mass media & citizens.
  • Our political parties are not used full transparency.

[Read more…] about Transcription of live tweet session on the State of Right to Information in Mauritius

Filed Under: Information, Mauritius, Politics, Press, Society Tagged With: access to information, africa freedom of information centre, freedom of information, Mauritius, media, Press, right to information

Report on the State of Access to Information in Africa 2017

17/10/2017 By christina 1 Comment

The Africa Freedom of Information Centre (AFIC) has published the Report on the State of Right to Information in Africa 2017 in the context of SDG 16.10.2. The full report which covers 23 African countries is available at: here and the summary version here.

I have contributed to the report by writing the country report for Mauritius. If you wish to read it, here is the country report.

Filed Under: Information, Mauritius, Politics, Press, Society Tagged With: access to information, africa freedom of information centre, freedom of information, Mauritius, right to information

Why do we need Freedom of Information?

30/09/2016 By christina 1 Comment

1. Why do we need freedom of information?
Freedom of information is a key ingredient of any country which purports to be a democracy. Having access to reliable information which is as complete as possible allows people to make rational decisions (e.g. who to vote for, which policies to support). FOI also deters political decision-makers from indulging in corrupt acts as these could be more easily detected and exposed in the public sphere.

2. What should it consist of?
Freedom of information encompasses press freedom but is not limited to this. The media are deemed to be important facilitators in the public sphere, like some sort of “intellectuals within the city”. In this tech-oriented world, FOI means giving access to all government files which are of public interest (excluding rare cases of national security issues). More importantly, we should ensure that such data is accessible in open formats which allow media people as well as ordinary citizens to scrutinise and analyse them.

3. Who does it benefit?

Democracy. All citizens.

4. How does it work abroad?
There are around 90 countries which have some form of FOI (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_information_laws_by_country). Normally, this means that any citizen should be able to either consult or get a copy of documents from public administrations. As Robertson explained in his preliminary report, it’s a pretty complex administration and it would take time to implement FOI if the law is indeed proposed and accepted. You would need to train civil servants and review the whole information system. And in some countries, FOI legislation has loopholes or is not necessarily well implemented for all sorts of reasons (technical issues, bureaucracy, obfuscation, etc) . Nevertheless, as it’s an important right in a democracy, we need to start working on it in Mauritius. Unfortunately, none of our politicians are currently committed to propose and implement FOI as it goes against their DNA. Civil society should lobby for it.

5. How will the people benefit from it?
With FOI, investigative reporting and detection of corruption becomes easier. There is more transparency on how public money (i.e. taxpayers’ money) is used. Hopefully, this should lead to more efficiency.

6. How does its absence refrain liberty and democracy?
Veils of secrecy always lead to even the most ethical persons to be prone to corruption once in power. FOI means more accountability and thus brings us nearer to the real definition of democracy (government by the people for the people).

7. Should we repeal the Official Secrecy Act?

FOI cannot exist if the Official Secrets Act and the Civil Service Manual, which forbids communication to the public and the press without higher authorisation, remain as they are. They are incompatible. Obviously, there are provisions for issues such as national security or trade secrets which would stay. But overall, the Official Secrets Act needs to be reviewed to remove the blanket culture of secrecy.

In an episode of Yes, Minister, Sir Humphrey states that the Official Secrets Act is “not there to protect secrets, but to protect officials”. (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Official_Secrets_Act)

Questions by Jameela Jadoo

This interview was done for News on Sunday in May 2014

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: democracy, freedom of information, Mauritius, media, official secrets act, Press, press freedom

Workshop on Freedom of Information

02/03/2016 By christina 4 Comments

At the MACOSS workshop on the Introduction of a Freedom of Information Act in Mauritius which was held on Friday 26th February 2016, three resource persons from South Africa were present, namely:

  • Maxwell Kadiri, Legal Officer at the Open Society Justice Initiative
  • Chantal Kissoon, Provincial Manager of the Gauteng Office at the South African Human Rights Commission
  • Lola Shyllon, Programme Manager: Freedom of Expression and Access to Information at the Centre for Human Rights of the University of Pretoria

They gave insightful presentations on the introduction and implementation of FOI in their country. You can read a transcript of my live-tweet during the presentations in this summary.

What I appreciated the most was the fact that they were all very thorough in their presentation of the South African experience, listing all issues they faced, the strategies they used to address those issues (such as prioritising grassroots access and incentivising public officers to adapt to FOI) and also the mistakes and lessons learned. They were very honest in their assessment of their own strategies and acknowledged that no system is perfect.

This is possibly the most important thing we, Mauritians, need to retain from our South African peers. There are many of us who wish to make things move forward but we can only do this if we do it together (without trying to take all the credit separately or trying to discredit others as is often the case) and if we are more humble and adopt a can-do, learning-by-doing and learning-from-mistakes approach.

After the presentations and Q&A sessions, we were asked to form working groups to brainstorm on issues and potential recommendations to follow up on the workshop.

I was the rapporteur for the first group and you can read below the report of our discussions and recommendations.

Overall, it was a very enriching experience which will hopefully be built upon to move forward towards a FOI Act in Mauritius. For context, you can read some of my previous publications on FOI and the related topic of media regulation here.

Proposals on the introduction of a Freedom of Information Act (FOI) or Right to Information Act (RTI) by working group #1

  • Strengths / opportunities
    Freedom of expression is already enshrined in the Mauritian Constitution as a fundamental right.
  • Successive governments have promised to introduce a Freedom of Information Act but this has never materialised. However, it is the first time that a government has published an official announcement by the cabinet of ministers, going beyond political party manifesto or PM and president’s addresses:

    Cabinet has taken note that the Freedom of Information Bill, as announced in the Government Programme 2015-2019, is being prepared. The main objective of the Bill will be to promote transparency and accountability in public administration

    This represents a tremendous opportunity to move forward and all stakeholders should lobby collectively towards its realisation with extensive consultation and participation.

  • There is already much information which is published online by government agencies though they are not always presented in a user-friendly way and updated in a timely manner.
  • There is already a Data Protection Act and a Data Commissionner. The office could be consolidated and asked to collaborate on the FOI.
  • There are structures such as Citizens Advice Bureaus but they need to be disconnected from the political and used as a real nexus for information to citizens.
  • There is some media regulation through the Independent Broadcasting Authority but it needs to be disconnected from the political and reclaimed as a really independent body.
  • Mauritius has a system of representative democracy with MPs who are supposed to represent their constituencies and they do put forward questions to governing parties on behalf of citizens but this is limited. This role should be reinforced and citizens should have better access to their MPs for requests for information.

Issues/challenges and potential solutions

  • Timeline for the law: One main issue is that promises are often made but rarely fulfilled. For FOI to really happen, there should a clearly identified timeline for the different stages, for example:
    • Consultation with all stakeholder groups
    • Presentation of Bill, voting of Act and enactment in Government Gazette
    • Setting up of process and training of civil servants
    • Setting up of independent appellate mechanism (for requests that are denied)
    • Deployment (including regular monitoring and adoption of corrective measures
    • etc.
  • Review of conflicting laws: There are laws, regulations and practices which can potentially hinder the application of FOI in Mauritius, for instance:
    • The Official Secrets Act
    • The human resource management manual of the civil service 5 which prohibits civil servants from giving out information
    • Sections of the Criminal Code relating to the dissemination of information such as the ones relating to publication of false news, defamation and sedition as well as  laws relating to contempt of court and public gathering, etc.These need to be reviewed in order to harmonise with the application of a proposed FOI Act.
  • Protection of private information: Currently, there is little protection for citizens whereby the latter would be made aware of any data relating to their own selves held by either government agencies or private entities. All individuals should be allowed access and knowledge of such data as in France (CNIL – Commission Nationale de l’Informatique et des Libertés) in order to avoid any abuse of personal information.
  • Delays to process requests: Very often, response to requests from the public take a very long time for many reasons (e.g. delaying tactics, inefficiency, etc.). The FOI law should specify reasonable timelines/delays to process requests from the public as well as to provide the information requested.
  • Preference for electronic data: Regarding payments for requests made, it is understood that there would be a fee for filing the request and a fee for the printout (to cover costs and to encourage sensible and responsible use of the service).
    One possible solution would be to reduce the costs associated with the printout by primarily providing the data in electronic format. This would also reduce ecological impact and facilitate further use by the citizen.
  • Assistance for fees: However, it is also understood that the imposition of a fee may deter underprivileged citizens from exercising their right to access information. It is thus proposed that a public fund be set up to assist in payment of the fees for processing and printout in case the citizens are under-equipped for data in electronic formats. This would go towards enhancing equality of justice for all.
  • Appeals against rejections: Some agencies may abuse of clauses for protection of access to data which may be of public interest. In order to ensure this is not the case, there should be an independent appellate mechanism to examine the validity of requests which have been rejected, as is the case in South Africa. However, in a small country like Mauritius, it may be very difficult to identify really independent people to examine appeals. It is proposed that the entity should encompass representatives of multiple stakeholder groups and interests to compound possible lack of indepedence.
  • Avoiding manipulation and stigmatisation: In a tiny country like Mauritius, controlled leakages and abuse of confidential information about individuals or partial information (resulting in manipulation / bias / sensationalism) may lead to stigma for individuals concerned. There is a need for regulation in the public spehere but not merely by a single entity and certainly neither solely by the State or by media companies. The preferred model is that of independent co-regulation of the media. There should in fact be sanctions for inaccurate information which may be published and which can cause stigma.
  • Literacy and awareness for grassroots: Very often, elite groups are the ones which benefit the most from systems which are supposed to benefit all. In order to ensure that there is equality in access to information, there should also be solid literacy and awareness actions for grassroots levels, right from school and at all customer care offices in the public service.
  • Eliminating language as a barrier: Another deterrent to use of facilities given by FOI may be language. But ordinary citizens do not necessarily have a good command of English or French. The use of the Creole language, our mother tongue, should also be admitted for filing requests with proper assistance and while taking care to avoid stigmatisation.
  • An inclusive working group: We strongly believe that it is important that the working group which will be set up tp lobby for the FOI should encompass all stakeholder groups with a collective agreement and a positive mindset in order to be able to move forward. The media should be taken onboard as well as more grassroots level organisations. There should be no backbiting or competitive attitude as FOI is not for a few but for the benefit of all citizens

Download the report on proposals of Working Group #1

Filed Under: Information, Mauritius, Press, Society, Uncategorized Tagged With: freedom of information, macoss, media, open society, SAHRC, university of mauritius, University of Pretoria

Primary Sidebar

Search

Recent Posts

  • Démocratie augmentée pour une transition écologique juste
  • On the subject of Media Regulation in Mauritius
  • A Supreme Court Judgement deems the offence of causing annoyance in the ICT Act to be “hopelessly vague”
  • My final submission to the ICTA on its proposed amendments to the ICT Act
  • The proposed amendments to the ICT Act to regulate social media in democratic Mauritius entail the risk of creating a surveillance state

Recent Comments

  • christina on Discovering the beauty of Rodrigues
  • Eddy Young on Discovering the beauty of Rodrigues
  • IFEX Africa Brief (May 2021): Visions of press freedom obscured, LGBTQI+ rights falter, an icon tells her story - iSPEAK on My final submission to the ICTA on its proposed amendments to the ICT Act
  • The proposed amendments to the ICT Act to regulate social media in democratic Mauritius entail the risk of creating a surveillance state on My final submission to the ICTA on its proposed amendments to the ICT Act
  • The Gender Divides of the Mauritian Society: Re-appropriating the Empowerment and Citizenship Discourse | Wits Journalism on The Gender Divides of the Mauritian Society: Re-appropriating the Empowerment and Citizenship Discourse (Publication)

Archives

  • June 2022
  • November 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • January 2019
  • November 2018
  • March 2018
  • December 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • April 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • March 2016
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • April 2014
  • June 2013
  • April 2013
  • October 2012
  • August 2011
  • September 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006

Copyright © 2023 · Genesis Sample On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in